Azure Container Instances vs Azure Kubernetes Service
Comparison
Category | Azure Container Instances | Azure Kubernetes Service |
---|---|---|
Definition | ACI is a serverless compute service that allows you to run containers without managing the underlying infrastructure | AKS provides a managed Kubernetes cluster |
Use Case | Ideal for short-lived tasks or burst workloads | Suited for long-running applications and orchestrating containerized workloads |
Billing Model | Billed per second, based on vCPU and memory usage | Billed for the VM nodes in the cluster (VM size, number of nodes) |
Cost Factors | Compute : Pay only when containers are running Storage : No persistent storage costs Networking : Minimal networking costs | Compute : Ongoing cost for VM nodes Storage : Persistent storage costs (Azure Disks, Azure Files, etc.) Networking : Load balancer, egress traffic, etc. |
Scalability | Scales automatically based on demand | Manual/Automated scaling of VM nodes |
Management Overhead | Minimal management; serverless | Requires more management (upgrades, scaling, monitoring) |
Advanced Features | Limited features (no orchestration, auto-scaling) | Rich Kubernetes features (auto-scaling, secrets management, RBAC) |
Usage | ACI can be used together with plain Kubernetes or AKS | AKS is a individual free managed service |
Cost example for a containerized web app | Costs depend on the duration of container execution | Costs include VM nodes, storage, and networking |
This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.